<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iran&#8217;s Saturn in Libra Destiny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalastrologyblog.com/2009/09/24/irans-saturn-in-libra-destiny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalastrologyblog.com/2009/09/24/irans-saturn-in-libra-destiny/</link>
	<description>Where astrology and politics meet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 05:04:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Dagan Best</title>
		<link>http://politicalastrologyblog.com/2009/09/24/irans-saturn-in-libra-destiny/comment-page-1/#comment-1587</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Dagan Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalastrologyblog.com/?p=1465#comment-1587</guid>
		<description>Saturnian,

Fair enough. Serves me right for jumping to conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturnian,</p>
<p>Fair enough. Serves me right for jumping to conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saturnian</title>
		<link>http://politicalastrologyblog.com/2009/09/24/irans-saturn-in-libra-destiny/comment-page-1/#comment-1582</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturnian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalastrologyblog.com/?p=1465#comment-1582</guid>
		<description>Perhaps not so ironic.  I said I was new at political astrology, not astrology.  I may not be seasoned, but have always had my own way of going about it. If you ever saw my chart, you&#039;d know why I get your concept.  Too much is sometimes just too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps not so ironic.  I said I was new at political astrology, not astrology.  I may not be seasoned, but have always had my own way of going about it. If you ever saw my chart, you&#8217;d know why I get your concept.  Too much is sometimes just too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Dagan Best</title>
		<link>http://politicalastrologyblog.com/2009/09/24/irans-saturn-in-libra-destiny/comment-page-1/#comment-1580</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Dagan Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalastrologyblog.com/?p=1465#comment-1580</guid>
		<description>Saturnian, 

Ironically, you&#039;re ahead of Gary and Funk on understanding what I&#039;m doing here, perhaps because they are seasoned astrologers and are unaccustomed to doing simple exercises like observing cycles in history. It is a common pitfall for astrologers making the transition from reading nativities to looking at the daily world. The struggle becomes more about finding a single chart to interpret, and less about stepping back and looking at the story as more of a whole.

A lot of astrologers, schooled mostly in natal chart interpretation, tend to apply a lot of astrological detail to examine a single subject. My starting point is to look at a lot of historical detail with a single astrological factor, and work my out from there. I do have midpoints and asteroids in my arsenal, but they do not come into play when looking at matters this broadly. To me, doing so is like putting a microscope in front of a telescope lens.

Photography is actually a handy model to use in understanding this distinction. This article could be said to be taken with a wide angle lens, capturing the magnitude of an entire landscape, while the common standard  is to use only a microscope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturnian, </p>
<p>Ironically, you&#8217;re ahead of Gary and Funk on understanding what I&#8217;m doing here, perhaps because they are seasoned astrologers and are unaccustomed to doing simple exercises like observing cycles in history. It is a common pitfall for astrologers making the transition from reading nativities to looking at the daily world. The struggle becomes more about finding a single chart to interpret, and less about stepping back and looking at the story as more of a whole.</p>
<p>A lot of astrologers, schooled mostly in natal chart interpretation, tend to apply a lot of astrological detail to examine a single subject. My starting point is to look at a lot of historical detail with a single astrological factor, and work my out from there. I do have midpoints and asteroids in my arsenal, but they do not come into play when looking at matters this broadly. To me, doing so is like putting a microscope in front of a telescope lens.</p>
<p>Photography is actually a handy model to use in understanding this distinction. This article could be said to be taken with a wide angle lens, capturing the magnitude of an entire landscape, while the common standard  is to use only a microscope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saturnian</title>
		<link>http://politicalastrologyblog.com/2009/09/24/irans-saturn-in-libra-destiny/comment-page-1/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturnian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalastrologyblog.com/?p=1465#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>Well, this thread has been interesting. I definantly learned something. (Not quite sure what that is yet.)  I think I understand the concept of a wide net, and many hooks though!  It seems to me that when you start throwing in the asteroids, midpoints, fixed stars, ect... you have many hooks...  I&#039;m new to mundane astrology, but I do know how to fish.  When I go fishing with my boy, we find a branch of an appropriate size, we attatch some line of an appropriate length, we tie on a hook, then add the appropriate bait and toss it in...  I was confused at first that your focus was only Saturns ingress into Libra. I now see it&#039;s the same kind of fishing I do.  No net, one hook... Catch something!  Sorry I can&#039;t keep up with all the more learned people here! I&#039;m pretty simplistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this thread has been interesting. I definantly learned something. (Not quite sure what that is yet.)  I think I understand the concept of a wide net, and many hooks though!  It seems to me that when you start throwing in the asteroids, midpoints, fixed stars, ect&#8230; you have many hooks&#8230;  I&#8217;m new to mundane astrology, but I do know how to fish.  When I go fishing with my boy, we find a branch of an appropriate size, we attatch some line of an appropriate length, we tie on a hook, then add the appropriate bait and toss it in&#8230;  I was confused at first that your focus was only Saturns ingress into Libra. I now see it&#8217;s the same kind of fishing I do.  No net, one hook&#8230; Catch something!  Sorry I can&#8217;t keep up with all the more learned people here! I&#8217;m pretty simplistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funkstar</title>
		<link>http://politicalastrologyblog.com/2009/09/24/irans-saturn-in-libra-destiny/comment-page-1/#comment-1563</link>
		<dc:creator>Funkstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalastrologyblog.com/?p=1465#comment-1563</guid>
		<description>Hello again Gary, I suppose the criticism I have of using the 0 degree cardinal idea is similar to the criticism you have of Nick&#039;s approach. The difficulty is in trying to link it back to Iran in particular, as opposed to the rest of the world. 

As for &quot;the moment the gavel is struck or when the proclamation is complete&quot;, I see potential in both charts, and in Nick&#039;s approach. Iran is a religious state which the 01 Feb chart shows really well. I haven&#039;t spent too much time analyzing the 01 Apr chart but I am impressed with the transits. As Nick and Axel point out this in an ancient culture and we do have to see the current regime as a transitory thing. It is unstable wether using transiting Pluto on the MC in the 01 Feb chart, or transiting Uranus on Mars in the 01 April chart. 

Now about Neda&#039;s death, I&#039;m all for using asteroids and midpoints too, but in the transits to the 01 Feb chart: 

Pluto 02cap03 conjunct MC 02cap06, 
Uranus 26pis35 square Venus 25sag28
Moon 29tau08 conjunct Fortunae 28tau51
AC 26sag24 conjunct Venus 25sag28 
&quot;women&#039;s revolution&quot;. 

One thing that did stand out in the 01 Apr chart was the Vertex at 00cap53.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello again Gary, I suppose the criticism I have of using the 0 degree cardinal idea is similar to the criticism you have of Nick&#8217;s approach. The difficulty is in trying to link it back to Iran in particular, as opposed to the rest of the world. </p>
<p>As for &#8220;the moment the gavel is struck or when the proclamation is complete&#8221;, I see potential in both charts, and in Nick&#8217;s approach. Iran is a religious state which the 01 Feb chart shows really well. I haven&#8217;t spent too much time analyzing the 01 Apr chart but I am impressed with the transits. As Nick and Axel point out this in an ancient culture and we do have to see the current regime as a transitory thing. It is unstable wether using transiting Pluto on the MC in the 01 Feb chart, or transiting Uranus on Mars in the 01 April chart. </p>
<p>Now about Neda&#8217;s death, I&#8217;m all for using asteroids and midpoints too, but in the transits to the 01 Feb chart: </p>
<p>Pluto 02cap03 conjunct MC 02cap06,<br />
Uranus 26pis35 square Venus 25sag28<br />
Moon 29tau08 conjunct Fortunae 28tau51<br />
AC 26sag24 conjunct Venus 25sag28<br />
&#8220;women&#8217;s revolution&#8221;. </p>
<p>One thing that did stand out in the 01 Apr chart was the Vertex at 00cap53.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Dagan Best</title>
		<link>http://politicalastrologyblog.com/2009/09/24/irans-saturn-in-libra-destiny/comment-page-1/#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Dagan Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalastrologyblog.com/?p=1465#comment-1561</guid>
		<description>Thanks Axel, I couldn&#039;t have said it better myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Axel, I couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axel</title>
		<link>http://politicalastrologyblog.com/2009/09/24/irans-saturn-in-libra-destiny/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>Axel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalastrologyblog.com/?p=1465#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>You can add most invasions from other states: the never depend on a country&#039;s constitution and not always on the régime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can add most invasions from other states: the never depend on a country&#8217;s constitution and not always on the régime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axel</title>
		<link>http://politicalastrologyblog.com/2009/09/24/irans-saturn-in-libra-destiny/comment-page-1/#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator>Axel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalastrologyblog.com/?p=1465#comment-1557</guid>
		<description>It seems plausible that constitution and régime maps will speak about things that flow from the constitution or régime in question, so the latest Iranian régime chart is valid for things happening in Iran now, especially political/legal/bureaucratic things. Maybe one could add religious in the case of Iran. But for the &quot;heart and mind&quot; of a country, whatever one considers that to be, one must have to go back to the foundation of the community which is necessarily anterior (what is it that adopted the constitution or had the régime imposed on it?) In many cases the data may be lost in the fog of time.
 
Sorry if any of you has read this before - it&#039;s a horse I have often whipped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems plausible that constitution and régime maps will speak about things that flow from the constitution or régime in question, so the latest Iranian régime chart is valid for things happening in Iran now, especially political/legal/bureaucratic things. Maybe one could add religious in the case of Iran. But for the &#8220;heart and mind&#8221; of a country, whatever one considers that to be, one must have to go back to the foundation of the community which is necessarily anterior (what is it that adopted the constitution or had the régime imposed on it?) In many cases the data may be lost in the fog of time.</p>
<p>Sorry if any of you has read this before &#8211; it&#8217;s a horse I have often whipped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Dagan Best</title>
		<link>http://politicalastrologyblog.com/2009/09/24/irans-saturn-in-libra-destiny/comment-page-1/#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Dagan Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalastrologyblog.com/?p=1465#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>....or you might reconsider this whole nation chart idea entirely ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.or you might reconsider this whole nation chart idea entirely <img src='http://politicalastrologyblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary P Caton</title>
		<link>http://politicalastrologyblog.com/2009/09/24/irans-saturn-in-libra-destiny/comment-page-1/#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary P Caton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalastrologyblog.com/?p=1465#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>Funkstar, it was not me who introduced the 0 degrees cardinal idea as a net of sorts -that is a general mundane principle -AND I was simply trying to find a way to piggyback onto what Nick has already presented here...

the reason I did not use the angles of a chart as you mentioned is that I am not quite sure the exact historical moment of Khomeini&#039;s return or proclamation, and even if I was (as is the case for Israel) -there remains the question: do you use the chart for the moment the gavel is struck or when the proclamation is complete?

So to answer your question, I am generally fishing in waters where Nick&#039;s net (and mundane astrology principles) seems to show something ought to be and I am using two hooks -transits and eclipses to the 01 April chart. 

Obviously it remains to be seen if I can get a big one to bite (via an accurate prediction), but it does seem that transits work particularly well with the 01 April chart because recently when Juno made her transit conjunction to Uranus June 19, 2009 (at the mid-point of 01 April natal Mars-Mercury) only a day later on June 20 we saw the death of Neda Agha-Soltan, an Iranian student shot during a protest. The video captured of this event soon went viral and helped to turn Neda into an International symbol of the civil unrest following the presidential election. This fits precisely with the function of the asteroids who, because they dwell between the personal and social planets, tend to make more personal the bigger social and collective forces.

It remains to be seen if eclipses have the same effect on this chart but we dont have long to wait. If nothing major happens until December then I may be inclined to examine the February chart more closely</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funkstar, it was not me who introduced the 0 degrees cardinal idea as a net of sorts -that is a general mundane principle -AND I was simply trying to find a way to piggyback onto what Nick has already presented here&#8230;</p>
<p>the reason I did not use the angles of a chart as you mentioned is that I am not quite sure the exact historical moment of Khomeini&#8217;s return or proclamation, and even if I was (as is the case for Israel) -there remains the question: do you use the chart for the moment the gavel is struck or when the proclamation is complete?</p>
<p>So to answer your question, I am generally fishing in waters where Nick&#8217;s net (and mundane astrology principles) seems to show something ought to be and I am using two hooks -transits and eclipses to the 01 April chart. </p>
<p>Obviously it remains to be seen if I can get a big one to bite (via an accurate prediction), but it does seem that transits work particularly well with the 01 April chart because recently when Juno made her transit conjunction to Uranus June 19, 2009 (at the mid-point of 01 April natal Mars-Mercury) only a day later on June 20 we saw the death of Neda Agha-Soltan, an Iranian student shot during a protest. The video captured of this event soon went viral and helped to turn Neda into an International symbol of the civil unrest following the presidential election. This fits precisely with the function of the asteroids who, because they dwell between the personal and social planets, tend to make more personal the bigger social and collective forces.</p>
<p>It remains to be seen if eclipses have the same effect on this chart but we dont have long to wait. If nothing major happens until December then I may be inclined to examine the February chart more closely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
